Hewitt, Holmquist
say AG opinion the right decision at the right time
Bill that would gag employers’ free speech
violates National Labor Relations Act, AG says |
(Printer Friendly) |
July 23, 2009
Olympia...
Today
Senate Republican Leader Mike Hewitt
and
Sen. Janéa Holmquist,
ranking Republican on the
Senate Labor, Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee,
praised a new state Attorney General’s opinion that says last
year’s “employer gag bill” would have violated the
National Labor Relations Act.
While the Attorney General's formal opinion focused on the
bill's prohibition on employer-employee communication regarding
union organizing activities, the bill would have also prohibited
all employer-employee communication related to legislation,
elected officials, candidates, religious observance (including
holidays), or charity drives. Even a note from an employer
inviting employees to participate in a Relay for Life event or a
Christmas party could have exposed an employer to a lawsuit.
Although
SB 5446/HB
1528
had appeared headed for passage this year, it died when some
legislators received an e-mail hinting that campaign
contributions depended on legislative approval. As Labor's top
priority, it is all but certain that the bill will be back again
next year.
Federal law -- The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) --
protects an employee's right to join or not to join a union and
establishes the boundaries and rules for the union organizing
process. Based on
many years of United States Supreme Court precedents, the
Attorney General
determined that the portions of the bill related to employer
communication to employees regarding union organizing activities
would be preempted by federal law -- meaning that the states
have no jurisdiction to regulate this activity.
“Our state is struggling to hold on to every job we can get,
including those in large companies like Boeing that have a very
big impact on our state’s economy,” said Hewitt, R-Walla Walla.
“Yet the Legislature was pushing a bill this year that told
employers we were going to completely remove their ability to
discuss union organizing activities in their own workplace and
then open them up to additional lawsuits.
This AG decision is the right one at the right time and
will hopefully help us reassure employers that we appreciate the
jobs they provide and that their voices are every bit as
valuable as the voices of Labor Unions.”
“The real intent behind the bill was to gag employers on issues
related to labor and management, giving labor an unfair
advantage in a process that is supposed to be fair,”
said Holmquist, R-Moses
Lake. “Now that the AG
has issued his opinion, I hope we won’t see this job-killing and
speech-stifling measure back again.”
Hewitt and Holmquist requested the AG opinion during the
legislative session when the bill was up for consideration. The
AG issued an informal opinion that came to the same conclusion.
The formal published opinion was issued yesterday.
While a formal attorney general opinion does not have the
force of law, it can be used as persuasive authority in a court
action. |