It’s time
property taxes went down
February 14, 2007
A
little-known fact tells the story: 72 percent of the property
taxes collected by the state are from assessments on
single-family homes – 72 percent! In 2005, the state collected
$1.6 billion in property taxes – that’s $1.1 billion from
homeowners.
But it gets
worse. The total collection of property taxes in 2005 was $6.9
billion when you combine collections by local governments, state
government and school districts. In Washington, if you can
afford to buy a home, you’ll soon find out what the real price
tag of your “American Dream” is when your property taxes come
due.
Right now, the 2007 Legislature is crafting the state’s next
two-year operating budget –blessed by a windfall of $1.9 billion
in unexpected revenue. There is no shortage of ideas on how to
spend this extra money; I think we should give it back to
homeowners.
My bill,
Senate Bill 5998, recognizes that the surplus was created
primarily by Washington’s booming real estate market and that
higher home prices mean higher property taxes. We need to talk
about who the money really belongs to, not about how many
different ways we can spend it.
Under my
proposal, the surplus would be returned to the people it came
from – the taxpayers. In 2008 the state’s property tax would be
reduced by 40.07 percent; in 2009 the reduction would be 39.13
percent, giving $1.4 billion back in needed tax relief.
Washington’s
property tax dates back to our territorial government; it’s been
in our constitution since Washington became a state in 1889.
It took 82
years, until 1971, before senior citizens were first granted
property tax exemptions depending on their incomes. It was 29
more years before a real limit for all homeowners was put on the
ballot.
In 2000,
Washington’s voters approved Initiative 722. This measure rolled
back assessed values to Jan. 1, 1999, and limited future
increases of taxable value to 2 percent per year. It also
limited non-voted property tax increases to 2 percent and rolled
back certain property tax increases levied for 2000. I-722 was
never implemented because it was immediately challenged and
ruled unconstitutional by the Washington State Supreme Court.
Voters spoke
again n 2001 when they enacted I-747. This measure limited state
and local property tax collections to no more than 1 percent
over the previous year’s collections. This time the voters’
wishes were implemented, but not for long. A King County
Superior Court judge threw I-747 out in June 2006 – on a
technicality. Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna is
appealing that decision, but its fate is uncertain.
To make
matters worse, legislation has been introduced this year to
allow cities and counties to impose a property tax on vehicles;
to allow counties to impose a regional property tax for schools;
to increase the state property tax rate for parks; and to allow
fewer voters to approve local school levies – the largest piece
of most homeowners’ property tax bill.
In addition
to my tax relief bill, I’ve introduced a bill to put the I-747
cap into state law – regardless of what comes out of the court;
and I’m proposing more property tax relief for senior citizens
and disabled veterans.
I also believe the Legislature
should give its support to my constitutional amendment that
would help people stay in their homes by controlling huge spikes
in property values that dramatically increase taxes. This is not
a new issue for me. I’ve introduced such legislation eight times
since 1996; and every time the Legislature has neglected to take
up this important issue.
This year, my proposal, Senate
Joint Resolution 8216, would freeze property values on Jan. 1,
2008, and limit reassessments to no more than 1 percent per
year.
I see this issue as a huge problem
that needs to be solved. Home values are cyclical; they never
have and never will level off. Sometimes values go up in small
increments, and sometimes they take big leaps. But they all add
up to more taxes and a bigger burden on families. This is
outrageous; we simply must do something.
It’s time
property taxes went down. People who have lived in their homes
for many years now have a house they couldn’t afford to buy, but
they are taxed as if they could. This is just wrong!
The
Legislature needs to listen to the people. It would be such a
travesty – given the $1.9 billion surplus
–
if the 2007 Legislature adjourns without giving homeowners
much-needed and long-awaited property tax relief.
###
(Sen.
Benton represents the 17th Legislative District in
Clark County.)
|